the Folkestone to Rye Defence Strategy Study homepagethe Folkestone to Rye Defence Strategy Study homepagemain strategy report opening pagemain strategy report opening page




Main Strategy Report
Section 6: Do nothing scenario

Introduction

To establish the likely benefits of actively managing the coastline through either investment in capital or maintenance activities there is first a need to establish a common base case against which to judge the worthwhileness of any management regime put forward. Under MAFF guidance (MAFF, 1995) the common baseline is the so-called 'do-nothing' case.

Identifying the consequences of a 'do-nothing' approach is therefore critical to the decision making process and the identification of a preferred management approach to a particular issue.

Under MAFF guidance, 'do-nothing' is always an option. Where there is no scheme in existence then the 'do-nothing' option is obvious; no action is taken to intervene with natural processes. Where a scheme is present, the 'do-nothing' option is to 'walk away' and abandon all maintenance and repair to existing structures; allowing nature to take its course.

Section 6 of the Strategy Report presents the likely consequences of adopting a 'do nothing' approach to coastal defence and provides the base case against which all management options presented in Section 7 Option Identification, Evaluation and Selection are judged. It is structured in four parts as follows :

Part I: Defence performance and problems
Part I presents a descriptive outline of the consequences of a 'do nothing' option for each Management Unit. It also presents a quantitative analysis of the defence performance assuming a 'do-nothing' policy is adopted. The performance criteria considered are overtopping, future erosion rates, breach probability and residual life

Part II: Do-nothing - flood risk
Part II presents the methodology adopted to establish flood risk and presents a series of flood risk maps for a range of do-nothing scenarios

Part III: Do-nothing - erosion risk
Part III presents the methodology adopted to establish erosion risk maps and quantifies the shoreline position at 0, 5, 10 and 25 years into the future

Part IV: Do-nothing - economic losses
Part IV quantifies the likely economic losses that maybe incurred if a 'do-nothing' policy is adopted. The methodology adopted and assumptions made are also presented


To view the document on screen (in Acrobat PDF format), click on the chapter titles below.
To download a printable version of a Section or Part (in PDF format), click on the icon

To download Acrobat Reader click here
To download Winzip click here


Copyright © 2001. All rights reserved